This is in fact a biased and misleading exhibit, in which the current state of research has been carefully distorted to cater to the interests of influential members of the old Dead Sea Scrolls monopoly group.
The group's control over access to the scrolls collapsed in the midst of scandal following John Strugnell's antisemitic outbursts some fifteen years ago, but they have retained control over the way the scrolls are presented in museum exhibits, even though their views have now been rejected by an entire series of major historians and archaeologists.
In a word, the Raleigh museum (which is run by the North Carolina Department of the Environment) agreed to downplay and conceal the evidence brought to light by Jewish researchers who, over the past decade, have rejected the old "Qumran-Essene" theory of scroll origins, and to physically exclude them from participating in the lecture series accompanying the exhibit.
Since the museum is a state-run institution, the role of government officials in displaying religiously controversial artifacts must also be addressed. Is it appropriate for a North Carolina government agency to take sides in an acrimonious scholarly dispute while entertaining people with a religiously oriented exhibit in, of all places, a natural sciences museum?
Is there any public accounting of how this exhibit was funded, and of where the profits ($22 per ticket) will be going to?
This is, of course, a serious issue that should be carefully examined by the media. Instead, we have silence, viciously implied innuendo about Jewish culture coming from North Carolina authorities (including an antisemitic insinuation on the museum's website), mendacious claims about a fabricated "consensus" that no longer exists, and a continuing pattern of catering to vested interests.
For further information on this propaganda masquerading as an exhibit, previously dished out to the public in various private "science" museums around the country, see, e.g.,
I have also read that the museum embarrassingly hired, as its "scientific consultant," a woman named Risa Levitt Kohn, who inaccurately described herself as a "Dead Sea Scrolls scholar" last year before admitting that she is "far from an expert" and that she has only a "tangential" knowledge of the topic.
She then also distinguished herself by declaring that the Dead Sea scrolls are not really "Jewish" texts, and that the public must not be "confused" with an accurate account of current research.
Furthermore, it must be pointed out that Kohn's catalog of errors, prepared for the San Diego exhibit, was demolished in another lengthy review by Golb -- see www.oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/dss_review_sandiego_catalogue_2007.pdf. Golb exposes so many elementary mistakes in this catalog, that one can only express amazement that the North Carolina Department of the Environment hired its author as a "scientific consultant."
Scrolls Student
This is in fact a biased and misleading exhibit, in which the current state of research has been carefully distorted to cater to the interests of influential members of the old Dead Sea Scrolls monopoly group.
The group's control over access to the scrolls collapsed in the midst of scandal following John Strugnell's antisemitic outbursts some fifteen years ago, but they have retained control over the way the scrolls are presented in museum exhibits, even though their views have now been rejected by an entire series of major historians and archaeologists.
In a word, the Raleigh museum (which is run by the North Carolina Department of the Environment) agreed to downplay and conceal the evidence brought to light by Jewish researchers who, over the past decade, have rejected the old "Qumran-Essene" theory of scroll origins, and to physically exclude them from participating in the lecture series accompanying the exhibit.
See, e.g., University of Chicago historian Norman Golb's editorial at http://www.forward.com/articles/10497/, as well as his more detailed article on "Fact and Fiction in Current Exhibitions of the Dead Sea Scrolls," available on the Oriental Institute website at http://www.oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/dss_fact_fiction_2007.pdf.
Since the museum is a state-run institution, the role of government officials in displaying religiously controversial artifacts must also be addressed. Is it appropriate for a North Carolina government agency to take sides in an acrimonious scholarly dispute while entertaining people with a religiously oriented exhibit in, of all places, a natural sciences museum?
Is there any public accounting of how this exhibit was funded, and of where the profits ($22 per ticket) will be going to?
This is, of course, a serious issue that should be carefully examined by the media. Instead, we have silence, viciously implied innuendo about Jewish culture coming from North Carolina authorities (including an antisemitic insinuation on the museum's website), mendacious claims about a fabricated "consensus" that no longer exists, and a continuing pattern of catering to vested interests.
For further information on this propaganda masquerading as an exhibit, previously dished out to the public in various private "science" museums around the country, see, e.g.,
http://spinozaslens.com/libet/articles/dworkin_ethicsofexhibition.htm
I have also read that the museum embarrassingly hired, as its "scientific consultant," a woman named Risa Levitt Kohn, who inaccurately described herself as a "Dead Sea Scrolls scholar" last year before admitting that she is "far from an expert" and that she has only a "tangential" knowledge of the topic.
She then also distinguished herself by declaring that the Dead Sea scrolls are not really "Jewish" texts, and that the public must not be "confused" with an accurate account of current research.
To learn more about this unsettling curatorial fiasco, see http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/did-christian-agenda-lead-biased-dead-sea-scrolls-exhibit-san-diego and follow the links.
Furthermore, it must be pointed out that Kohn's catalog of errors, prepared for the San Diego exhibit, was demolished in another lengthy review by Golb -- see www.oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/dss_review_sandiego_catalogue_2007.pdf. Golb exposes so many elementary mistakes in this catalog, that one can only express amazement that the North Carolina Department of the Environment hired its author as a "scientific consultant."